In this video Bashar, channelled by Darryl Anka, answers a question about manifestation or rather about things not manifesting as intended. He asks “Do you understand the Law of Attraction” and then explains, that the basics of the basics of the Law of Attraction is, to decide to feel joy no matter what the outside looks. “You just decide how you are going to be and then behave like it…” Something to remember![youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dSKYMC6vOQ&feature=related[/youtube]
- 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- 2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Unsere ganze Gesellschaft – und wie mir scheint, weltweit – ist auf das Kämpfen ausgerichtet. “Du musst dich durchkämpfen” – “Ohne Fleiß kein Preis” – Du musst arbeiten, bis dir das Blut aus den Fingern spritzt” – endlose Sprüche, auf die schon die Kleinsten im Kindergarten geeicht werden.
So many people want a happy relationship and so many are everything but happy together. They expect happiness from their partners, parents expect happiness from their children, charity people expect gratefulness from alms…. Expectations, expectations, expectations and quasi all are a deception – must be a deception, because nobody can give you what you really want: You, Yourself. Abraham explains it very clearly:
Do you know the relationship that you are all looking for?
Do you know what it really is?
You want the relationship between you and You. And when you meet a person who looks fondly at you, or who is appreciative of you, or someone you look fondly upon, or someone you appreciate, it just hooks you up to your Inner Being, which is what you want all along.
So the relationship you are all looking for is the relationship between you and you. And everything else is just helpful in that, really. Don’t you find that interesting? That what you really want is a reason to vibrationally connect with who you really are.
And so, you ask so much of people because you say to them, “You need to be the one who causes me to feel good.” And what we want to say to all of you is if any of you are without the relationship of your dreams right now, that’s a wonderful thing because now you have an opportunity to work on the relationship that really matters first and foremost. And then, in that connection, the relationship of your dreams will come. But you are going to discover the relationship of your dreams is really your own Inner Being. It’s that infusion of clarity and confidence and wellness, that’s what you are reaching for.
And it is nice to have a human friend who holds you as their object of attention and adores you right into your connection, but we want you experience greater independence than that. We want you to say to you lovers, “I love you, but I don’t live for you because Source Energy flows through me. You are a catalyst to my wellbeing, but you are not essential to my wellbeing because I’ve got that figured out on my own. I have reached for thoughts that give me relief. And I have relieved myself all the way into my full connection of who I really am. And now we can just dance and play together.”
Can you feel how you take them off the hook? In other words, do you know how many men would flock to you …if they knew that you would allow them to be as they are and you would not hold them responsible for your happiness?
That’s what everyone wants. How much bondage is there in believing that your happiness depends on me, so I’ve got to figure out what you want, and stand on my head in all those different ways, and it’s not even possible!
The greatest gift you can give anyone is to be happy. And we will take that further. The greatest gift you can give to any partner, past, present or future is to be so connected with who you truly are that they are irrelevant to your connection. And when they are irrelevant to your connection, then you are going to have a really good time together.
In this exercise you are practicing initially with acknowledging your experiences and what you are expressing, whether you like it or not, and not pushing, not attempting to eliminate, not attempting to rid yourself or divorce yourself from your experience,
The question which was asked to Bashar was about a treatment for cancer – for liver cancer. His answer however is valuable for all kind of diseases. He speaks especially about “magnetic fields” and the body as an “electric battery” and how this knowing can serve to create methodologies of healing.
Bashar: All right. Now: we have shared with many of you, at many times, some ideas about what you might call physiological treatment for any type of disease at all. It will always depend upon your belief system, primarily, as to whether any of these ideas will work for you, however. And it will always depend upon the reason for why you have attracted the idea and created it into your life. For if you have a good enough reason to hang on to it, you will – regardless of any so-called cure. Because only individuals cure themselves, no matter whom they go to. So there are many ideas, many ideas.
First of all: one idea can be to understand, from what you may call a consciousness point of view, the symbolism of what you may call the filtering system, in that sense, of the liver. And to recognize that if you believe there are ideas – cancerous ideas – within a consciousness and that they must be filtered out, then that may not actually be an integration process. It may be a process of trying to segregate those ideas from you, not accepting them as a part of you to be balanced, blended and transformed, rather than gotten rid of, or expelled from the consciousness. Sometimes a reaction to the idea of attempting to get rid of what you may believe to be negativity or cancerous ideas within you can cause a build-up in organs that symbolize the idea of the filtration system of the body.
To some degree, this has been some of the primal reasons for the general creation of that disease. So, first and foremost, if an individual begins to understand – metaphysically-speaking, as you say, consciously speaking, as you say, energy-speaking, as you say – that it is not about getting rid of anything, but about integrating, facing, and going through the ideas; then you can transform ideas into methodologies, into ideas, into opportunities that serve, rather than trying to get rid of them as if they have no business being in anyone’s life.
Now, one very strong methodology, which your society is only just now beginning to play around with, I shall say – and I do not mean that derogatorily – is the idea that the body is an electrical conduit, a magnetic conduit. And you can create electrical fields, magnetic fields, very strong fields vibrating at certain frequencies, one of which would be seven and one-half cycles per second, the frequency, electromagnetically speaking, of your planet. And by immersing a body in that electromagnetic field, you can create a conducive, literally, a conductive atmosphere that may allow the person immersed in that field to allow themselves to realign with the natural field of the earth. For when an individual is balanced with the natural electromagnetic field of the earth, there can be no disease at all of any type, in any way, shape or form.
That is one way to create such a magnetic field. You have just recently in your society invented devices called magnetic resonance imaging scanner devices. Some of these are used to diagnose, but tuned to different frequencies, they can also be used to cure – something that your scientists are only just beginning to realize. Also the idea has been discussed, and much literature exists in your society, about the notion of treating the physiological body like what you would call an electric battery, and simply recognizing disease as being out of potential, out of electrical balance. Recreating an electrical balance in the body will allow the energy systems to flow in the natural way they need to: realign and flush out and transform all the imbalance back into a balanced state.
These are two of the strongest ways. There may be other ideas that come up that you may call cures of various types. But every kind of a cure that you invent, if it works for an individual, will only be an exteriorized reflection of what you already believe is possible for you. And remember that even in the creation of disease, even though it may start out from an invalidational and judgmental point of view – from a negative point of view – recognize that because you are choosing your reality, that someone who even chooses a disease, does so out of strength. Because they know they can handle whatever it is that disease will teach them, one way or another. So if you look at the idea from the point of view of strength instead of weakness, then you can self-empower the being to recognize that they, in creating it, have the opportunity to create it in another way, to transform it into another creation.
Über die “menschenverschuldete Klimakatastrophe”
Wir leben jetzt in einer Zeit, in der wir mit Riesenschritten in’s Chaos übergehen, sozusagen,
Kryon bestätigt hier, dass die Aussagen von Christus und Buddha von den jeweiligen Kirchen manipuliert wurden, um die Menschen zu kontrollieren und auszubeuten, letztendlich das Ziel dieser Art von Kontrolle.
FRAGE: Lieber Kryon, sage uns bitte etwas über die Rollen der beiden großen Lehrer – Buddha und Christus. Wenn man buchstäblich nach den Lehren jeder dieser beiden Meister lebt, so scheint es, dass sie nicht die gleiche Wahrheit predigen. Doch wenn es einen Gott gibt, sollte es auch eine Wahrheit geben. Was ist die Wahrheit bezüglich dieser widersprüchlichen Lehren? Einer scheint zu lehren, dass das Ende der Wünsche das Tor zur Unsterblichkeit oder Nibbana ist, der andere lehrt, dass durch die Annahme der Erlösung am Kreuz, wir Frieden mit Gott gemacht haben und unsere Ewigkeit gesichert ist.
ANTWORT: Deine Frage basiert auf dem, was dir heute gesagt wird. Wenn du verstehen würdest, um was es bei beiden wirklich ging, würdest du noch nicht einmal die Frage stellen. Die heutige „Geschichte“ wurde von den Führern dieser beiden organisierten Religionen manipuliert. Die Idee der Annahme der Erlösung am Kreuz zu akzeptieren hat gar nichts zu tun mit der eigentlichen Absicht des Meisters der Liebe, der Christus war. Das ganze Szenario wurde später aufgrund einer falschen Annahme erstellt, und tat denjenigen gut, die die Bevölkerung mit der Religion kontrollieren wollten. Die Geschichte wird zeigen, dass sie das taten. Buddhas (Siddhartas) volle wahre Leidenschaft wurde auch nicht offenbart. Beider Lehren wurden früh abgekapselt und überarbeitet, um den Bedürfnissen derjenigen gerecht zu werden, die Kontrolle über diese Lehren hatten.
Die oben genannten Informationen mögen dich traurig machen, aber sei dir bewusst, dass du dich mit beiden dieser großen Meister verbinden kannst, wann immer du willst. Und wenn du das tust, dann wirst du feststellen, dass die Wahrheit die gleiche ist. Die ultimative Befreiung für alle Wesen ist in dir. Du bist des ewigen Friedens mit Gott versichert, weil du ein Teil von Gott bist. Auch der Meister Christus hat euch gesagt, dass ihr genau so sein könnt wie er … ein Sohn Gottes. Wie rechtfertigst du diese Information gegenüber dem, was schließlich zur Lehre wurde? Seid ihr nicht alle betroffen darüber, dass es keine Begeisterung gab, als es „geplant“ wurde? Wusstet ihr, dass Christus über eure vergangenen Inkarnationen gelehrt hat? Wo steht das in der Schrift? Warum fehlt es?
Die Dinge sind nicht immer so, wie sie scheinen, und ihr müsst weiter schauen als nur auf das, was die Menschen euch gegeben oder weggenommen haben. Seht, was sie manipuliert und von beiden Lehren entfernt haben. Stattdessen ist es jetzt an der Zeit, die Wahrheit aus eurem Innern zu ziehen. Wenn ihr das tut, dann werdet ihr friedlich alle Lehren der großen Meister rechtfertigen, die von Kultur zu Kultur weitergegeben wurden, die Einheit für alle gelehrt haben und die Großartigkeit des Menschen herausgestellt haben.
Lass dies deinen Glauben nicht erschüttern, denn die Liebe Gottes ist immer noch das Höchste in all diesen Dingen, und wenn du sie suchst, dann wirst du die wahren Nachrichten entdecken, und dann wirst du diese Meister umso mehr lieben
Und das sagt Bashar über Jesus, Buddha, Mohamed, Krishna und andere…
Seth: As you read the words upon this page, you realize that the information that you are receiving is not an attribute of the letters of the words themselves. The printed line does not contain information. It transmits information. Where is the information that is being transmitted then, if it is not upon the page?
The same question of course applies when you read a newspaper, and when you speak to another person. Your actual words convey information, feelings, or thoughts. Obviously the thoughts or the feelings, and the words, are not the same thing. The letters upon the page are symbols, and you have agreed upon various meanings connected with them. You take it for granted without even thinking of it that the symbols – the letters – are not the reality – the information or thoughts – which they attempt to convey.
Now in the same way, I am telling you that objects are also symbols that stand for a reality whose meaning the objects, like the letters, transmit. The true information is not in the objects any more than the thought is in the letters or in words. Words are methods of expression. So are physical objects in a different kind of medium. You are used to the idea that you express yourselves directly through words. You can hear yourself speak them. You can feel the muscles in your throat move, and if you are aware, you can perceive multitudinous reactions within your own body actions that all accompany your speech.
- Physical objects are the result of another kind of expression. You create them as surely as you create words. I do not mean that you create them with your hands alone, or through manufacture. I mean that objects are natural by-products of the evolution of your species, even as words are. Examine for a moment your knowledge of your own speech, however. Though you hear the words and recognize their appropriateness, and though they may more or less approximate an expression of your feeling, they are not your feeling, and there must be a gap between your thought and your expression of it.
The familiarity of speech begins to vanish when you realize that you, yourself, when you begin a sentence do not know precisely how you will end it, or even how you form the words. You do not consciously know how you manipulate a staggering pyramid of symbols, picking from them precisely those you need to express a given thought. For that matter, you do not know how you think.
You do not know how you translate these symbols upon this page into thoughts, and then store them, or make them your own. Since the mechanisms of normal speech are so little known to you on a conscious level, then it is not surprising that you are equally unaware of more complicated tasks that you also perform – such as the constant creation of your physical environment as a method of communication and expression.
It is only from this viewpoint that the true nature of physical matter can be understood. It is only by comprehending the nature of this constant translation of thoughts and desires – not into words now, but into physical objects – that you can realize your true independence from circumstance, time, and environment.
Now, it is easy to see that you translate feelings into words or bodily expressions and gestures, but not quite as easy to realize that you form your physical body as effortlessly and unselfconsciously as you translate feelings into symbols that become words.
You have heard the expression before, I am sure, that the environment expresses a particular individual’s personality. I am telling you that this is a literal and not symbolic truth. The letters upon the page have the reality only of ink and paper. The information they convey is invisible. As an object, this book itself is only paper and ink. It is a carrier of information.